ఊళ్ళేలనివారు రాజ్యాలేలుతారా?
ullelanivaru rajyalelutara?
Will those who cannot rule a village be able to rule kingdoms?
This proverb is used to criticize someone who aspires for great responsibilities or high positions while failing to handle small, basic tasks. It emphasizes that competence at a smaller scale is a prerequisite for larger leadership roles.
Related Phrases
రాముడు లేని రాజ్యం లాగ
ramudu leni rajyam laga
Like a kingdom without Rama.
This expression describes a place or situation that lacks its true leader, soul, or essential guiding force. Just as the kingdom of Ayodhya felt desolate and directionless when Lord Rama was in exile, this phrase is used to describe a scene of emptiness, chaos, or lack of joy despite having all other material resources.
రామరాజ్యంలో బంగారం కరువు, భరత రాజ్యంలో భోజనం కరువు
ramarajyamlo bangaram karuvu, bharata rajyamlo bhojanam karuvu
In Rama's kingdom there is a scarcity of gold, in Bharata's kingdom there is a scarcity of food.
This expression is used to highlight the irony of scarcity in places of abundance or to describe situations where basic needs or expected luxuries are surprisingly unavailable. It often points to poor distribution or specific hardships despite a generally good reputation.
నోరు ఉన్నవాడిదే రాజ్యం
noru unnavadide rajyam
The kingdom belongs to the one who has a mouth.
This expression is used to describe a situation where people who are articulate, vocal, or assertive tend to dominate or succeed, regardless of their actual merit or the truth. It is similar to the English proverb 'The squeaky wheel gets the grease.'
జిల్లేళ్ళకు మల్లెలు పూయునా?
jillellaku mallelu puyuna?
Will jasmine flowers bloom on Calotropis plants?
This proverb is used to emphasize that one's inherent nature or upbringing cannot be changed. It suggests that good qualities or noble results cannot be expected from something that is fundamentally bad or inferior, just as a fragrant jasmine cannot grow on a bitter Calotropis (Jilledu) shrub.
రాజ్యాలు పోయినా, రాచరికాలు పోలేదు.
rajyalu poyina, racharikalu poledu.
Even if the kingdoms are gone, the royal attitudes have not left.
This expression is used to describe people who have lost their power, wealth, or status but still cling to their old ego, arrogance, or bossy behavior. It highlights the irony of someone acting superior despite no longer having the means or position to justify it.
రాజులు పోతే రాజ్యాలు పోతవా?
rajulu pote rajyalu potava?
If kings go, do kingdoms disappear?
This expression is used to convey that the world or an organization does not stop functioning just because a leader or a specific individual is gone. It emphasizes that systems are larger than individuals and that life goes on despite the departure of those in power.
ఏ రాజ్యానికి ఏ రాజో అన్నట్లు
e rajyaniki e rajo annatlu
Like saying which king for which kingdom
This expression is used to describe a situation where the quality or nature of a leader (or outcome) is perfectly matched to the nature of the people (or circumstances). It often implies that a group of people gets the kind of leadership or consequences they deserve based on their own behavior or character.
ఊహలు ఊళ్ళేలుతుంటే, కర్మం కట్టెలు మోస్తున్నది
uhalu ullelutunte, karmam kattelu mostunnadi
While imaginations rule villages, fate is carrying bundles of firewood.
This proverb is used to describe a situation where someone has grand dreams or high aspirations, but their actual reality or destiny remains miserable and full of hard labor. It highlights the stark contrast between one's fantasies and their practical circumstances.
జిల్లేళ్ళకు మల్లెలు పూస్తాయా?
jillellaku mallelu pustaya?
Do jasmine flowers bloom on crown flower plants?
This expression is used to signify that good results or noble qualities cannot be expected from someone who is inherently bad or from a source that is inferior. It is similar to the English proverb 'You cannot gather grapes from thorns'.
గుడ్డివాళ్ళ రాజ్యంలో ఒంటికంటివాడే రాజు.
guddivalla rajyamlo ontikantivade raju.
In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
This proverb is used to describe a situation where a person with limited or mediocre abilities is considered superior or exceptional because everyone else in that environment is completely unskilled or lacks knowledge. It highlights how competence is relative to the group one is in.