పేచీకి పెదబాబు

This expression is used to mock or describe a man who prefers the company of women over men, or one who meddles excessively in domestic affairs and women's conversations. It characterizes a man who acts like a leader or an authority figure specifically in female circles where he may feel more dominant or comfortable.

This expression is used to describe a couple who are both difficult in their own ways—one being naughty or unruly, and the other being argumentative or picky. It implies a household filled with constant chaos or conflict due to the incompatible or troublesome nature of both partners.

This proverb suggests that the true character and loyalty of a spouse are tested during difficult financial times. It implies that while everyone is supportive during prosperity, only a truly devoted partner remains respectful and supportive when wealth is lost.

One may give a noble speech, even if one is financially poor. The nobility of one does not depend on one’s wealth or the lack of it.

This proverb highlights the transient nature of power and social status. It suggests that authority and leadership are only relevant while a person is alive and present in society; once deceased, their worldly influence vanishes and they belong only to the graveyard.

This expression is used to describe something that is of an awkward size or quantity, making it useless for any specific purpose. It refers to a situation where a resource is neither small enough to be used for one thing nor large enough to be used for another, rendering it ineffective or redundant.

This proverb implies that when people without power or resources get angry, they cannot harm those they are angry at; instead, they only end up hurting themselves. It is used to describe a situation where expressing frustration is futile or self-destructive due to one's lack of influence.

This proverb is used to criticize someone who neglects their basic duties or responsibilities—such as taking care of elders or family—but spends their time and energy on vanity, creating unnecessary arguments, or maintaining a false sense of prestige.

This expression is used to remind others that being economically disadvantaged or lacking wealth does not mean a person lacks self-respect, dignity, or cultural identity. It suggests that poverty affects one's physical needs, but should not diminish their social standing or the respect they deserve.

Used to describe a person who is extremely troublesome, argumentative, or someone who always finds a reason to pick a fight or create a dispute. It implies that the person is a 'pioneer' or a 'master' at creating unnecessary complications.