పీర్ల పండుగకు గోకులాష్టమికి ఏమి సంబంధము?

This expression is used to describe a situation where getting involved with certain types of people or commitments leads to irreversible consequences or self-destruction. Historically, it refers to the strict and uncompromising nature of the Lingayats (Lingadharulu), implying that once you are associated with them, there is no turning back, much like the finality of jumping into a deep river like the Ganges.

This expression is used to highlight situations where there is no logical connection between the components mentioned, or where someone makes a completely irrelevant or mismatched choice. It often mocks a lack of compatibility or a nonsensical pairing in social or business dealings.

This expression is used to highlight a total lack of relevance or connection between two things. Just as a Sheikh (Muslim) typically has no religious connection to Gokulashtami (a Hindu festival), it describes a situation where a person is meddling in something that doesn't concern them, or when an argument is completely unrelated to the topic at hand.

This expression is used to describe a situation where someone finds a small reason to celebrate or gains a minor benefit amidst a significant loss or a wasteful expenditure. It refers to making the best of a bad situation or finding a silver lining in a calamity.

This expression is used to highlight a total lack of connection or relevance between two things being discussed. It describes a situation where someone brings up an unrelated topic, similar to the English idiom 'comparing apples and oranges' or 'having no rhyme or reason.'

This expression refers to a very remote, forced, or far-fetched connection between two things or people. It is used when someone tries to establish a relationship or logic where none naturally exists, similar to the concept of 'six degrees of separation' but used more ironically or mockingly.

Both Ekadashi and Gokulashtami are traditional Hindu fasting days. This proverb is used to describe a woman who faces poverty or hardship in both her parents' house and her in-laws' house, suggesting there is no respite from hunger or struggle in either place.

This expression is used to describe two events or things that are completely unrelated or incongruous. It highlights a situation where someone is trying to link two totally different topics that have no logical connection, similar to the English phrase 'Comparing apples and oranges'.

This expression is used to describe a situation where an unexpected or unnecessary additional expense occurs at a time when one is already spending heavily, typically during a celebration or crisis. It signifies the burden of 'wasteful' costs added to already high costs.

This expression is used to describe people who are willing to spend money on useless things, penalties, or unnecessary losses but hesitate or refuse to spend money on something auspicious, joyful, or beneficial. It highlights poor priorities and the irony of people's spending habits.